Skip to main content

Introducing research ethics

Solent University requires that ethical clearance must be obtained before any research project or innovation activity can commence and potential human participants can be approached. 

It is the responsibility of the principal investigator, whether a student or a member of staff to obtain ethical clearance.


The following projects may not need ethical approval:   

  1. Ad-hoc academic audit or service evaluation projects designed and conducted solely to produce information to inform the delivery of provision. These would usually involve analysis of existing data and may include minimal participation from staff or students;  
  2. Literary or artistic criticism; 
  3. Testing and review within normal education requirements, and 
  4. Projects that draw on documentary material already in the public domain. 

However, research/innovation activities involving focus groups will need to secure ethical clearance.

How to make an ethics application

Follow the links below to find out about different kinds of ethics applications:

Information for students

Information for supervisors

Information for members of staff

Information for panel members/deputy chairs

Useful resources and sample forms

Research Ethics indicative reading list

Research ethics release criteria

Example informed consent form

Example participant information sheet

When undertaking research, it is important to consider implications for data protection. Please read the University's information on the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Research ethics committee and governance

Research ethics standing panels report to the University Research Ethics Committee (UREC). For further information about Solent University's research ethics structures please view our ethics committee terms of reference:

Research Ethics Committee Terms of Reference

Solent University, as a signatory to UUK, upholds the commitments of the Concordat to Support Research Integrity. 

Concordat to Support Research Integrity 

The University supports high standards of research integrity with a range of associated policies and procedures.

University Research Ethics Policy (Academic Handbook 2S)

University Research Ethics Procedure (Academic Handbook 4S)

Student Academic Misconduct Policy (Academic Handbook 2L)

Student Academic Misconduct Procedure (Academic Handbook 4L)

Staff Research Misconduct Policy (Academic Handbook 2T)

First points of contact for research integrity

Enquiries about the University’s response to the Concordat to Support Research Integrity – Catherine Lee, Chair of the Research, Innovation and Enterprise Committee (  

Enquiries about the University's Whistleblowing Policy - Dean of the relevant School or Director of Service (023 8201 3000,

  • Professor Syamantak Bhattacharya, Dean, Warsash School of Maritime Science and Engineering 
  • Dr Diane Bray, Dean, School of Sport, Health and Social Sciences
  • Sara Briscoe, Dean, School of Business, Law and Communications 
  • Dr Caroline Carpenter, Director, Policy, Governance and Information 
  • Paul Colbran, Chief Information and Infrastructure Officer 
  • David Corless, Director, Estates and Facilities 
  • Leigh Rengger, Chief Marketing Officer 
  • Nona McDuff, Pro-Vice Chancellor, Students and Learning 
  • Catherine Lee, Director, Research, Innovation and Enterprise 
  • Professor Peter Lloyd, Dean, School of Art, Design and Fashion 
  • Paul Marchbank, Dean, School of Media Arts and Technology 
  • Andy Riggs, Chief Finance Officer 
  • Andrea Thompson, Chief People Officer, People and Development 

Best principles for metrics-based research

Solent University has adopted the principles of both the Leiden Manifesto and the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) which foreground best practice in the use of metrics-based research assessment. Both Leiden and DORA respond to concerns about the reliability and value of research evaluation using quantitative data and set out the principles for responsible, transparent and contextualised use of data balanced by informed peer judgement.

Read more about the Leiden Manifesto

Read more about DORA

Back to top